Anticipating the Energy Crisis: Building Resilient Supply with Scenarios

Stability doesn’t start with technology—it starts with strategic foresight.
In the past, energy planning was often seen as a purely technical task. Today, however, geopolitics, supply chains, climate goals, and a constant state of crisis define reality. For decision-makers, this means: energy planning is no longer routine. It is part of the national security architecture.

Many facilities rely on redundant systems, emergency generators, or alternative power feeds. But what happens when supplies run out? When fuel becomes scarce? What if networks fail—not just accidentally, but due to targeted attacks?

Redundancy isn’t a comprehensive plan. It’s a technical fallback. Systemic vulnerability arises precisely where operational planning relies on statistical assumptions. What’s missing is strategic resilience—and that begins with scenarios.

Whether it’s a gas dispute, cyberattack, or supply chain blockade—many crises have political warning signs, as we see daily in global events. Yet in energy planning, they are often ignored or passively observed.

THORIUM, our resilience planning platform, changes that:

• It integrates geopolitical risks directly into scenario models.

• It assesses the impact on operations, supply chains, and security of supply.

• It simulates response options for peacetime, disruption, and crisis scenarios.

  
  
  

And it does so not based on gut feeling, but with solid data. In real time, visually, and decision-relevant.

A NATO-adjacent site is redesigning its energy supply. The goal is to ensure operational reliability in a crisis, including supply shortages due to geopolitical tensions.

Together with HDC Solutions, a scenario-based model is developed:

Scenario 1: Supply chain disrupted for ten days, diesel reserves critically low.

Scenario 2: The power grid is unstable due to cyberattacks.

Scenario 3: Supply is prioritized for medical modules and the command center (Critical Core).

Result: By adjusting storage capacities, cross-sector coupling, and adaptive operational strategies, supply is demonstrably secured in all scenarios.

A paradigm shift is underway at the political level. With the so-called KRITIS Umbrella Act, the German government aims to make minimum standards for operators of critical infrastructure legally binding—including risk analyses, reporting obligations, and disruption monitoring.

For energy sector operators, this means the era of voluntary robustness measures is over. Physical security, protection against outages, and the inclusion of geopolitical scenarios in planning will soon be legally required.

The pressure is high, and deadlines are tight. Once the law takes effect, operators will face strict implementation timelines—planning should start today to avoid penalties and supply risks.